Regulations for Peninsula College of Medicine
1 | PREAMBLE | ||
1.1 | Introduction | ||
The Peninsula College of Medicine (the College), its committees and the Regulations for its awards, have been established jointly following a Memorandum of Agreement by the Universities of Exeter and Plymouth (the Universities). The degrees, diplomas and certificates of the College will be awarded jointly by the University of Exeter and the University of Plymouth on the recommendation of the School's Award Boards, unless through a formal agreement at the time of programme approval. | |||
1.2 | Precedence of Regulations | ||
These Regulations and associated Codes of Practice carry precedence over those of the Universities except where indicated. |
|||
1.2.1 |
Codes of Practice and Other Rules |
||
Staff and students shall observe the requirements of the College Codes of Practice and such other rules as may be approved from time to time by the JARB. |
|||
1.3 | Awards | ||
The following qualifications may be awarded: |
|||
Joint Awards of the University of Exeter and University of Plymouth |
|||
In the context of the academic regulations and Codes of Practice, a programme of study is defined as a taught or research programme offered by the College and operating under College structures, awarded by the University of Exeter and the University of Plymouth. |
|||
1.4 | Use of Degrees and Other Awards | ||
No candidate shall be entitled to the use of a degree or other award or to any of the privileges of a graduate until s/he has been awarded the degree or other qualification. No student may receive an award for which they have qualified whilst owing monies to the College or to either of the Universities. | |||
2 | GOVERNANCE: JOINT APPROVAL AND REVIEW BOARD |
||
2.1 |
The Universities shall maintain (subject to the revised terms set out in Part 2 of Schedule 4 of the Legal Agreement) a Joint Approval and Review Board ("JARB") to act on their behalf in the oversight of the Joint Programmes during the Teach Through Period. |
||
2.2 |
The membership of the JARB shall comprise the following representatives from each University: |
||
A Deputy Vice Chancellor |
|||
2.3 |
The Joint Approval and Review Board has the authority to co-opt such additional members as it believes are necessary and/or to invite individuals to attend specific meetings, including chairs and/or members of its sub-committees as appropriate. Such invited persons shall not have voting rights. |
||
2.4 | The powers of the JARB acting on behalf of the two Universities shall be to: | ||
2.4.1 | oversee the management of the Joint Programmes and arrangements for their governance during the Teach Through Period, including programme review and monitoring, quality assurance, the student experience, curriculum development and resourcing; | ||
2.4.2 |
assure quality assurance procedures on behalf of the Universities , sufficient to address the requirements of the GMC and GDC; |
||
2.4.3 | consider reports from the meetings of the MPMC : | ||
2.4.4 | consider reports from its Finance Group and NHS Finance Sub-Group as appropriate and ensure that sufficient resources are made available to sustain the teach through of the Joint Programmes in line with the financial management structure approved by the Universities, including approval of items of expenditure not included in the Adjusted Budget; | ||
2.4.5 |
oversee, monitor the delivery of, review and, where necessary, amend SLAs between the Universities relating to the delivery and resourcing of the Joint Awards during the Teach Through Period; |
||
2.4.6 | undertake such specific roles as are allocated to it in this Disaggregation Agreement, including but not limited to agreeing communications to Joint Students, and ensuring that graduation ceremonies operating on a rotational basis between the two universities do not give undue prominence to one or other University; | ||
2.4.7 |
recommend to the Senate of Exeter and the Senate of Plymouth (or to committees acting on their behalf) approval of amendments to regulations or other matters as may be determined from time to time; |
||
2.4.8 |
maintain oversight of and monitor academic quality and standards in relation to the Joint Programmes, through, inter alia, consideration of the outcome of internal and external academic reviews; the outcomes of programme monitoring; reports from the respective Deans in relation to the medical teach through; and audits of teaching quality and learning outcomes against national and professional benchmarks; |
||
2.4.9 |
maintain oversight of the management of progression and awards on the Joint Programmes, including, inter alia, approving the appointment of external examiners, approving the composition and authorities of progression and award boards, and monitoring the delegation by the Universities of the approval of awards; |
||
2.4.10 | maintain oversight of the quality of the student experience, through inter alia, review of student feedback questionnaires and the NSS and the receipt of information from the student body; | ||
2.4.11 | maintain oversight of clinical placements, based on reports from the relevant Locality Associate Deans or senior clinical representatives; | ||
2.4.12 |
agree the information to be used by each University as part of the Key Information Sets for students for its own medical programmes in so far as that information relates to the history of PCMD; |
||
2.4.13 |
keep under review its structure of sub-committees and groups, and the existing themed groups, so as to ensure that the committee structure necessary to secure effective governance of the Teach Through Period is not over-burdensome and continues to be appropriate for the ongoing level of activity. |
||
2.5 | The Chair of the JARB shall be one of the two Deputy Vice-Chancellors, acting alternately on an annual rotational basis. The Chair shall have an individual vote but not a casting vote. The Deputy Vice-Chancellor from Exeter shall Chair for the first academic year. | ||
2.6 |
PUPSMD Registry Services will provide the Secretary to JARB. |
||
2.7 | If a member of JARB is unavoidably unable to be present they shall have the right to nominate an alternate to attend on their behalf, such alternate to have voting rights. | ||
2.8 |
Any individual invited to attend all or part of a meeting of JARB shall not have voting rights. |
||
2.9 |
The quorum for a meeting of JARB shall be seven members provided always that at least three members are present from each of the Universities. |
||
2.10 | JARB shall meet at least once a term. JARB shall have the ability to call an extraordinary meeting if the need arises. | ||
3 | UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES | ||
3.1 | Preamble | ||
All aspects of a programme of study shall be carried out in compliance with the Universities’ Diversity Policy. Students registered on a programme of study must comply with these Regulations and the College Code of Practice, approved by the Joint Approval and Review Board (JARB) and stated in the programme documentation. |
|||
3.1.1 |
Modes of Study for each programme are detailed in the Prospectus and Programme Specification. |
||
3.2 | Programme Awards | ||
3.2.1 | Requirements | ||
Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (BM,BS) | 600 Credits | ||
Bachelor Medical Science (BMedSci) (hons) Subject to the requirements set out in the Code of Practice. |
360 Credits |
||
3.2.2 | Recognised Qualifications | ||
The Degrees of Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery together shall constitute a recognised medical qualification with the General Medical Council of the United Kingdom. |
|||
Recognised qualifications can only be taken as full time programmes. |
|||
3.3 | Award and Assessment Governance | ||
3.3.1 | The College will have delegated authority to approve awards on behalf of the Universities. | ||
3.3.2 | The College, on behalf of JARB, shall establish Award Boards and Assessment Panels. The constitution of Progress and Award Boards and Assessment Panels is set out in a Code of Practice. The Progress and Award Board shall be responsible for the determination of undergraduate awards/exit qualifications and the award of credit. The Progress and Award Board shall act at all times according to the assessment policies and procedures approved by the JARB and published in the College Codes of Practice. | ||
3.3.3 | Each module in a programme shall be assigned to an assessment panel. Assessment panels shall determine the forms of assessment to be used, both formative and summative, in line with the processes and procedures approved by the JARB and published in codes of practice. Assessment Panels will also commission external advisors where appropriate. In addition, Assessment Panels shall co-ordinate standard setting and validation and assess acceptability of the module through, inter alia, student feedback, assessor feedback and test performance analysis. | ||
4 | DEGREES BY RESEARCH: MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY, DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY | ||
4.1 | General Conditions | ||
4.1.1 |
Master of Philosophy (MPhil) |
||
4.1.2 |
Candidates successfully completing the degree of MPhil will have demonstrated: |
||
(a) a systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of their academic discipline, field of study, or area of professional practice; |
|||
(b) a comprehensive understanding of techniques applicable to their own research or advanced scholarship; |
|||
(c) originality in the application of knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline; | |||
(d) conceptual understanding that enables the student:
|
|||
(e) Candidates for MPhil must integrate within their research an approved element of transferable skills training. | |||
4.1.3 |
Candidates successfully completing the degree of PhD will have demonstrated: |
||
(a) the creation and interpretation of new knowledge, through original research or other advanced scholarship, of a quality to satisfy peer review, extend the forefront of the discipline, and merit publication; |
|||
(b) a systematic acquisition and understanding of a substantial body of knowledge which is at the forefront of an academic discipline or area of professional practice; |
|||
(c) the general ability to conceptualise, design and implement a project for the generation of new knowledge, applications or understanding at the forefront of the discipline, and to adjust the project design in the light of changing circumstances; |
|||
(d) a detailed understanding of applicable techniques for research and advanced academic enquiry. |
|||
4.1.4 | Candidates whose work forms part of a larger group project may register for a research degree but each registered Masters or doctoral programme must be distinguishable for the purposes of assessment. | ||
4.1.5 |
Candidates for PhD must integrate within their research an approved element of transferable skills training. |
||
4.1.6 | Candidates who do not already hold an appropriate Masters award may be required to undertake training in order to gain competence in appropriate research methodologies. | ||
4.1.7 |
Degrees conferred under these Regulations will be joint awards of the University of Exeter and the University of Plymouth. |
||
4.2 | Supervision and Progress | ||
4.2.1 |
All candidates shall normally have at least two and not normally more than three supervisors, one of whom shall be nominated as the Director of Studies for the candidate's programme. The appointment of supervisors shall be subject to the approval of the Chair of the Research Degrees Committee. |
||
4.2.2 |
The Director of Studies must be an individual holding a formal staff contract with the one of the two Universities. If the Director holds an honorary contract, the second supervisor must hold a substantive contract with one of the two Universities. |
||
4.2.3 | All candidates are required to submit an annual report on their research at the end of each academic year; failure to submit such a report may result in termination of registration. | ||
4.2.4 | A candidate who fails to make satisfactory progress may be required to withdraw by the Research Degrees Committee. | ||
4.2.5 |
Each candidate is required to re-register at the beginning of each academic year until receipt of the examiners’ final decision. |
||
4.3 | Transfer from MPhil to PhD | ||
4.3.1 | The Research Degrees Committee shall review all applications to transfer from MPhil to PhD. | ||
4.3.2 |
An application for transfer to the degree of PhD should be made not earlier than one year after initial registration, but before the end of the second year of registration in the case of full-time candidates and before the end of the third year for part-time candidates. The transfer is retrospective to the date of initial registration. |
||
4.3.3 | A candidate for the degree of PhD may apply to the Research Degrees Committee at any time prior to the submission of the thesis to transfer to the degree of MPhil and to count the period of study already completed under the former registration towards that degree. | ||
4.4 |
Submission / Examination |
||
4.4.1 |
At least three months prior to submission of a thesis, each candidate’s Director of Studies shall submit a nomination of examiner’s form to the Research Degrees Committee which shall include details of examiners experience in research degree examining and areas of research. |
||
When submitting a thesis for examination, each candidate shall include an undertaking: |
|||
(a) that the thesis is written in English; |
|||
(b) that all the material in the thesis or dissertation which is not the candidate's own has been identified; and |
|||
(c) that the thesis or dissertation does not include any material previously submitted and approved for the award of a degree except as expressly permitted by the Chair of the Research Degrees Committee. |
|||
4.4.2 | Submissions for the degree of MPhil or PhD may include the content of papers by the candidate that have been published or have been accepted for publication. Such papers should relate directly to the candidate's approved field of study. | ||
4.4.3 | Examination arrangements for each candidate are subject to the approval of the Research Degrees Committee. Arrangements that differ from these Regulations and their associated procedures must be approved in each case on the recommendation of the Committee by the Chair of the Joint Approval and Review Board of the two Universities. | ||
4.4.4 | Candidates will be examined by at least two examiners of whom at least one must be an external examiner. No examiner, unless there are exceptional circumstances, shall have acted as supervisor of the candidate. | ||
4.4.5 | If a candidate is a member of the academic staff of the University of Exeter or the University of Plymouth, there must be at least two external examiners in addition to an internal examiner. | ||
4.4.6 |
The candidate will be examined viva voce. All the approved examiners must be present. The viva voce will be conducted in English. Prior to the viva voce examination, each examiner should submit a written preliminary report on the thesis. |
||
4.4.7 | After the viva voce examination the examiners will report on the thesis or dissertation and the viva voce examination. Where they are not in agreement, separate reports and recommendations will be submitted to the College. | ||
4.4.8 |
Where the appointed examiners are unable to reach agreement, provision will be made for the appointment of an additional external examiner whose judgement shall be final. |
||
4.4.9 |
Following completion of the examination the examiners will make one of the following recommendations: |
||
(a) that the degree be awarded; |
|||
(b) that the degree be awarded subject to minor corrections and/or amendments being made to the thesis or dissertation, normally within three months of notification, to the satisfaction of the examiners; |
|||
(c) That the degree be awarded subject to the student making major amendments to the thesis (as specified in the accompanying report) normally within a maximum of nine months of notification, and to the satisfaction (confirmed in writing) of the following internal and/or external examiner(s): |
|||
(d) that the candidate be permitted to resubmit for the degree and be re-examined on one further occasion with or without a further viva voce examination, by a specified date and with or without further research; |
|||
(e) that, in the case of a PhD examination, the degree be not awarded but that the degree of MPhil be awarded subject to the presentation of the thesis amended to the satisfaction of the examiners. |
|||
(f) that the degree be not awarded and the candidate be not permitted to be re-examined. |
|||
4.4.10 | A thesis or dissertation may be resubmitted on one occasion within such period of further study as the examiners recommend and the Research Degrees Committee approves. A candidate preparing for resubmission will be required to maintain registration as a student. | ||
4.4.11 |
A candidate who fails to submit a corrected or revised thesis or dissertation by the date determined by the examiners will normally be regarded as having failed the examination and the recommendations of the examiners shall lapse. |
||
5 | DEGREES BY RESEARCH: DOCTOR OF MEDICINE OR MASTER OF SURGERY | ||
5.1 | General Conditions | ||
5.1.1 |
Candidates may register for the degree of Doctor of Medicine (MD) or Master of Surgery (MS). They may also under prescribed conditions register initially for the degree of Master of Philosophy (MPhil)2 with possible, later transfer to the degree of MD or MS. Candidates may transfer to the degree of PhD upon successful completion of the process described in section 6.4. |
||
5.1.2 |
Candidates successfully completing the degree of MD/MS will have demonstrated: |
||
(a) the creation and interpretation of new knowledge, through original research or other advanced scholarship, of a quality to satisfy peer review, extend the forefront of the discipline, and merit publication; |
|||
(b) a systematic acquisition and understanding of a substantial body of knowledge which is at the forefront of an academic discipline or area of professional practice; |
|||
(c) the general ability to conceptualise, design and implement a project for the generation of new knowledge, applications or understanding at the forefront of the discipline, and to adjust the project design in the light of changing circumstances; |
|||
(d) a detailed understanding of applicable techniques for research and advanced academic enquiry. |
|||
5.1.3 | Candidates whose work forms part of a larger group project may register for a research degree but each registered doctoral programme must be distinguishable for the purposes of assessment. | ||
5.1.4 | Candidates for MD/MS must integrate within their research degree programme an approved element of transferable skills training. | ||
5.1.5 |
Candidates who do not already hold an appropriate Masters award may be required to undertake training in order to gain competence in research methodologies. |
||
5.1.6 | Degrees conferred under these Regulations will be joint awards of the University of Exeter and the University of Plymouth. | ||
5.2 | Supervision and Progress | ||
5.2.1 |
All candidates shall normally have at least two and not normally more than three supervisors, one of whom shall be nominated as the Director of Studies for the candidate's programme. The appointment of supervisors shall be subject to the approval of the Chair of the Research Degrees Committee. |
||
5.2.2 | The Director of Studies must be an individual holding a formal staff contract with one of the two Universities. If the Director holds an honorary contract, the second supervisor must hold a substantive contract with one of the two Universities. | ||
5.2.3 | All candidates are required to submit an annual report on their research at the end of each academic year; failure to submit such a report can be expected to result in termination of registration. | ||
5.2.4 | A candidate who fails to make satisfactory progress may be required to withdraw by the Research Degrees Committee. | ||
5.2.5 | Each candidate is required to re-register at the beginning of each academic year until receipt of the examiners’ final decision. | ||
5.3 | Transfer from MPhil to MD/MS or MD/MS to PhD | ||
5.3.1 | The Research Degrees Committee shall review all applications to transfer from MPhil to MD/MS or MD/MS to PhD. | ||
5.3.2 | An application for transfer from MPhil to MD/MS or from MD/MS to PhD should be made no earlier than one year after initial registration, but before the end of the second year of registration in the case of full-time candidates and before the end of the third year for part-time candidates. The transfer is retrospective to the date of initial registration. | ||
5.3.3 | A candidate for the degree of MD/MS may apply to Research Degrees Committee at any time prior to the submission of the thesis to transfer to the degree of MPhil and to count the period of study already completed under the former registration towards that degree. | ||
5.4 | Submission / Examination | ||
5.4.1 |
At least three months prior to the submission of a thesis for examination, a candidate’s Director of Studies must submit a nomination of examiner’s form which will include details of the examiners’ experience in research degree examining and areas of research. |
||
When submitting a thesis for examination each candidate will include an undertaking: |
|||
(a) that all the material in the thesis which is not the candidate's own has been identified; and |
|||
(b) that the thesis does not include any material previously submitted and approved for the award of a degree except as expressly permitted by the Chair of the Research Degrees Committee. |
|||
5.4.2 |
Submissions for the degree of MD/MS may include papers by the candidate that have been published or have been accepted for publication. Such papers should relate directly to the candidate's approved field of study. |
||
5.4.3 |
Examination arrangements for each candidate are subject to the approval of the Research Degrees Committee. Arrangements that differ from these Regulations and their associated procedures must be approved in each case on the recommendation of the Committee by the Chair of the Joint Approval and Review Board of the two Universities. |
||
5.4.4 |
Candidates will be examined by at least two examiners of whom at least one must be an external examiner. No examiner, unless there are exceptional circumstances, shall have acted as supervisor of the candidate. |
||
5.4.5 | If a candidate is a member of the academic staff of the University of Exeter or the University of Plymouth there will be at least two external examiners in addition to an internal examiner. | ||
5.4.6 |
The candidate will be examined viva voce. All the approved examiners will be present. The viva voce will be conducted in English. Prior to the viva voce examination, each examiner should submit a written preliminary report on the thesis. |
||
5.4.7 |
After the viva voce examination the examiners will report on the thesis and the viva voce examination. Where they are not in agreement, separate reports and recommendations will be submitted to the College. |
||
5.4.8 | Where the appointed examiners are unable to reach agreement, provision will be made for the appointment of an additional external examiner whose judgement will be final. | ||
5.4.9 |
Following completion of the examination the examiners will make one of the following recommendations: |
||
(a) that the degree be awarded; |
|||
(b) that the degree be awarded subject to minor corrections and/or amendments being made to the thesis, normally within three weeks of notification, to the satisfaction of the examiners; |
|||
(c) That the degree be awarded subject to the student making major amendments to the thesis (as specified in the accompanying report) normally within a maximum of nine months of notification, and to the satisfaction (confirmed in writing) of the following internal and/or external examiner(s): |
|||
(d) that the candidate be permitted to resubmit for the degree and be re-examined on one further occasion with or without a further viva voce examination, by a specified date and with or without further research; |
|||
(e) that the MD/MS degree be not awarded but that the degree of MPhil be awarded subject to the presentation of the thesis amended to the satisfaction of the examiners; |
|||
(f) that the degree be not awarded and the candidate be not permitted to be re-examined. |
|||
5.4.10 | A thesis may be resubmitted on one occasion within such period of further study as the examiners recommend and the Research Degrees Committee approves. A candidate preparing for resubmission will be required to maintain registration as a student. | ||
5.4.11 | A candidate who fails to submit a corrected or revised thesis by the date approved by the Research Degrees Committee will normally be regarded as having failed the examination and the recommendations of the examiners shall lapse. | ||
6 | GENERAL REGULATIONS | ||
6.1 | Conduct of Assessments | ||
6.1.1 | Every examination or assessment for a degree or other award provided by the College shall be conducted as defined in the College Code of Practice and the Assessment Technical Manual. | ||
6.1.2 | External examiners shall be appointed by JARB. Appointment shall normally be for no more than four years. External examiners shall be required to make a report to the Dean or Head of the School on the examination or assessments or assessment procedures they have reviewed. | ||
6.1.3 | All assessments and examinations shall be reviewed and monitored by the Programme Management Committee. JARB, and where appropriate, the requirements of external bodies such as the General Medical Council and the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education shall be taken into account. | ||
6.1.4 | JARB shall establish, from time to time, such rules for the conduct of assessments and examinations as it deems necessary and the College Secretary shall be responsible for ensuring compliance. Where a student fails to comply with these Regulations or a code of practice this may be treated as a disciplinary matter. | ||
6.2 | Student Responsibilities | ||
6.2.1 | Registration and Payment of Fees | ||
Students are required to register at the time of their admission to a programme of study and annually thereafter. Only students who have registered and paid any tuition fee required are entitled to tuition and access to any College and other academic and NHS facilities and assessments relevant to the programme. |
|||
Where continuing students have a debt to the College or one of the Universities they must clear the debt or reach an agreement for payment with the College Secretary before they will be allowed to re-register and continue their studies. |
|||
6.2.2 | Permitted period of study for professional programmes | ||
The minimum duration of the Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery degree is five years. Under normal circumstances, a student must satisfactorily complete all assessments and examinations within seven years to qualify for the award of Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery. |
|||
Retrospective registration may be permitted but only in exceptional circumstances and with the approval of JARB. |
|||
6.2.3 | Attendance, Absences and Extenuating Circumstances | ||
All students are expected to be in attendance as required by their programme of study and to attend all of the teaching events required by their programme. Where students are absent because of illness, they must notify the College in compliance with the rules in place and published by the College in a Code of Practice. Likewise, where students believe that their performance in an assessment has been adversely affected by extenuating circumstances they must notify the College as set out in the Code of Practice. | |||
6.2.4 | Interruption of Studies | ||
In exceptional circumstances, for example as a result of a serious illness or other difficult personal circumstance, a student may be permitted to interrupt their studies and temporarily withdraw from a programme. The period of interruption shall not normally exceed one academic year. Permission to temporarily interrupt studies shall require the approval of the Chair of the appropriate Progress and Award Board. Under normal circumstances, a student on a programme leading to a Recognised Qualification may be permitted to resume their programme of study from the beginning of the academic year only, subject to demonstrable clinical competencies and knowledge. |
|||
6.2.5 | Withdrawal from a Programme of Study | ||
A student who wishes to withdraw from their programme of study must notify the College in writing of their intention to do so as soon as the decision is made. Failure to notify promptly may mean a liability for tuition fees, residence fees or repayment of a student loan. A student considering withdrawal should seek advice and support from their academic tutor, personal tutor or equivalent, or relevant student support service. Compliance with the correct procedure on withdrawal, including notification to a Local Authority, is very important if an individual is not to jeopardise their chances of further Local Authority or Student Loan Company support. |
|||
6.2.6 | Identity Cards | ||
Students and members of staff must always be able to produce their ID card to obtain access to College teaching environments, University and programme related NHS facilities and assessment venues. Detailed requirements shall be set out in codes of practice and conditions of use. | |||
6.2.7 | Safety | ||
All students are required to comply with the safety provisions applicable within the College and to undertake such safety training as their programmes of study may require. They must follow the safety instructions issued by the Dean and other authorised persons and observe the safety rules of the Universities and NHS facilities applicable to the sites and in the premises in which they undertake their learning. The rules relating to safety shall be published by the College in a Code of Practice. | |||
6.2.8 | Conduct and Discipline | ||
Students of the College are expected to conduct themselves in a way that permits the College and its members, to fulfil its aims without hindrance. Within the College and in the wider community, students are expected to conduct themselves in a responsible way with due consideration for others and to comply with the law. Conduct deemed unsatisfactory may be referred to the College Fitness to Practise Committee or be treated as a disciplinary matter. Procedures relating to conduct and disciplinary action are published by the College in a Code of Practice. | |||
6.2.9 | Cheating including Plagiarism | ||
Students must be aware that any assessment irregularity or cheating or plagiarism, intended or otherwise, occurring during or as part of an assessment, including the preparation of a thesis, may have serious consequences and could lead to a requirement to withdraw. The rules relating to academic dishonesty are published by the College in a Code of Practice. | |||
6.2.10 | Criminal Convictions | ||
All students should have declared any criminal convictions at the application stage. Where a student is charged with a criminal offence after entry to a programme of study or research, they shall notify the College Secretary in writing, promptly and at the latest within 2 working days of charges having been made. | |||
6.2.11 | Residence | ||
Where students of the College are accommodated in property owned and/or managed by one of the Universities or one of the College’s partner organisations, they shall adhere to the regulations and rules prescribed by the University or that organisation for its accommodation. Failure to comply may be treated by the College as a disciplinary offence. | |||
6.2.12 | Library and Information Technology Resources | ||
Students are required to observe all rules made by the College or the Universities or one of the College’s partner organisations relating to the use of IT facilities or libraries. The College and the Universities reserve the right to withdraw IT and library facilities from students in debt to the College or to either of the Universities. | |||
6.2.13 | Use of Motor Vehicles | ||
Students must observe such rules and regulations as may be made from time to time by the College and the Universities and the College partner organisations for the use of motor vehicles by students. Failure to do so may constitute a disciplinary offence. Students should ensure that they have appropriate insurance for the use of their vehicle on College related business. | |||
6.3 | Student Rights | ||
6.3.1 | Complaints | ||
The College is committed to striving for the highest quality in all of its activities. To achieve this it maintains a student complaint procedure to be used when informal resolution of a complaint has failed. The procedure is set out in the College Codes of Practice and all students informed of its existence at the time of their first registration for their programme of study. | |||
6.3.2 | Academic Appeals | ||
A student may submit an appeal against a decision of a Progress and Award Board which affects his/her academic progress or right to an award. Appeals must be made in line with the procedures set out in the Code of Practice. |
|||
Appeals will only be considered to have preliminary grounds where the student can provide evidence that:
and/or
|
|||
Extenuating circumstances (whether relating to College issues, personal or medical problems or any other issue) which are not submitted to the College by the due date may be considered as grounds for appeal only in the most exceptional circumstances (for instance where the student was unable to disclose the circumstances in advance because of a medical condition). Since the College permits the submission of extenuating circumstances under confidential cover, the fact that a student did not wish to disclose personal information will not normally be considered as an exceptional circumstance. |
|||
The following do not constitute grounds for appeal:
The submission of an appeal will not be to the further detriment of a student’s academic position. |
|||
Procedure3 |
|||
Appeals shall be conducted in accordance with procedures set out in the code of practice approved by JARB. | |||
6.4 | Fitness to Practise and Occupational Health | ||
6.4.1 | For students on any programme leading to a professional medical or dental qualification, these Regulations and the fitness to practise procedures set out in the Code of Practice shall take precedence over Regulations relating to academic appeals, progression or discipline. | ||
6.4.2 | Details of the right to appeal shall be included in the College procedures set out in a code of practice. | ||
6.5 | Post Obitum Awards | ||
6.5.1 |
In the event of a candidate's decease the JARB, on the recommendation of the Award Board, may award, and/or cause to be conferred, a degree, diploma or certificate post obitum, provided that: |
||
(a) for first degrees in instances where the candidate has died before completion of the required examinations, the Award Board has consequently considered the candidate's academic record including coursework and performance in previous examinations in the College and is satisfied that, had the student taken the examination or assessment, the student would have passed. |
|||
(b) for first degrees in instances where the candidate has completed the examination, a favourable report has been received from the appropriate Progress and Award Board. | |||
6.6 | Aegrotat Awards | ||
6.6.1 | There is no provision for aegrotat awards for the BMBS. | ||
6.6.2 |
On the recommendation of the Progress and Award Board concerned, students on programmes other than the BMBS, who are prevented by illness or exceptional personal circumstances from taking a deferred assessment at any stage may request that an Aegrotat pass or, at the final stage, the award of an unclassified Aegrotat degree be considered. This can only be processed if the Progress and Award Board concerned has submitted a written report to the JARB certifying: |
||
(a) that it is satisfied that the candidate's absence from the deferred assessment was justified by reason of illness or exceptional personal circumstances, and that the evidence received had included a medical certificate or other appropriate documentation attesting to the candidate's absence submitted to the Head of Registry Services; |
|||
(b) that it had subsequently considered the candidate's academic record including coursework and performance in previous assessments in the College, and was satisfied that the programme of study leading to the deferred assessment had been completed, and that the assessment would have been passed had the candidate not been prevented from taking it. | |||
6.6.3 | An aegrotat Pass or Award will be permitted on one occasion only during the course of a student’s programme of study. | ||
6.7 | Data Protection | ||
All students shall comply with the terms of the Data Protection Act 1998 in the course of their studies. Failure to comply with the Act may constitute a disciplinary offence. |
1 Separate Regulations exist for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine/Master of Surgery
2 Separate Regulations exist for the degree of Master of Philosophy
3 If the student is still unhappy with the outcome further advice can be sought from the Office of the Independent Adjudicator