D - Disciplinary Procedure – Non-academic Misconduct
1 | Preface |
1.1 | The University of Exeter is a community, and as members of this community students are expected to adhere to University rules and regulations, to show respect for persons and property, and to behave in a way that does not interfere with normal operations of the University. Each student has the right and ability to make decisions about his or her conduct, and the responsibility to accept the consequences of their decision. Where there is reason to believe that rules and regulations have been broken, and/or when the behaviour of a student falls below the expected standards outlined in section 5 below, the Disciplinary Procedures will be instigated by authorised staff acting as Disciplinary Officers, (see section 14 below). |
1.2 | The maintenance of discipline and good conduct is the responsibility of Senate, and these procedures outline the means by which disciplinary matters involving non-academic misconduct will be managed, and the sanctions that may be imposed. |
1.3 | The Disciplinary Procedures define misconduct as either minor or major depending on the seriousness of the alleged misconduct, and the specific procedures for each are outlined below. |
1.4 | Where misconduct has occurred, the intention will be to focus on a corrective response rather than one which is solely punitive. |
1.5 | In cases where the alleged offence may pose a risk to staff and students, the procedures should be used to assess and manage such risk. Where risk is judged to be serious a recommendation may be made to a Deputy Vice-Chancellor to temporarily suspend or exclude the student from all or parts of the University grounds and facilities. The authority to permanently expel a student from the University is granted exclusively to Senate. |
2 | Scope of the Disciplinary Procedures |
2.1 | The Disciplinary Procedures apply to all undergraduate, postgraduate taught and postgraduate research students registered at the University of Exeter, on all campuses and those registered on INTO programmes. |
2.2 | Where disciplinary action relates to incidents occurring in student accommodation owned or managed by FXPlus in Cornwall, these regulations may take precedence. |
3 | Relationship and interface with other policies and procedures |
3.1 | The Disciplinary Procedures relate to matters of non-academic misconduct. |
3.2 | Where the alleged misconduct relates to academic matters, it should be referred for action under Chapter 12 - Academic Conduct and Practice procedures or Research Misconduct procedure https://as.exeter.ac.uk/academic-policy-standards/student-cases-and-conduct/academicmisconductincludingexaminationmisconduct/ http://as.exeter.ac.uk/academic-policy-standards/tqa-manual/pgr/ |
3.3 |
Following the outcome of a complaint brought under the University's Complaints procedure or the Staff Grievance procedure, the behaviour of a student/students may be referred under these procedures. |
3.4 |
Complainants will not be entitled to know the outcome of disciplinary proceedings that have resulted from a complaint brought by a student and/or a grievance brought by a member of staff. |
3.5 |
Records relating to minor offences shall be held locally by the Disciplinary Officer responsible for instigating the procedure except where professional accrediting bodies require notification to the College concerned. Students registered on programmes leading to membership of a professional body should demonstrate appropriate behaviour and standards required for entry into that profession. Alleged misconduct which may be judged to fall short of the professional codes of conduct should be considered under the Fitness to Practise Procedures. Details of the programmes of study covered by these regulations can be found in Annex 1 of the Fitness to Practise Procedures. http://www.exeter.ac.uk/staff/policies/calendar/part1/otherregs/fitness/ |
3.6 |
Where there is a concern that health or disability may have directly impacted on behaviour and/or conduct, the matter will be considered for referral to Wellbeing Services for support under its processes and procedures. Where necessary, reasonable adjustments will be made to the Health, Wellbeing and Support for Study Procedures or Disciplinary Procedures in respect of any illness or disability experienced by the student. |
3.7 |
Where a student feels that disciplinary proceedings affect their wellbeing or if they are disabled or require reasonable adjustments this should be requested as required with Student Conduct via studentconductmail@exeter.ac.uk The University has a Wellbeing Service who can provide support to students during the disciplinary process. Should a student feel that they would benefit from the support offered by the Wellbeing Service, they may inform Wellbeing that they are seeking support in relation to this process, and Wellbeing staff will aim to accommodate support before and/or after any disciplinary investigation meeting/hearing as required. Students may request welfare support during the investigation meeting/hearing, if required. |
3.8 |
In the event that an investigation into an alleged offence raises concerns for the welfare of an individual the Authorised Officer, with the Student's consent, may raise their concerns with the University's Welfare Caseworkers. |
3.9 |
The University places great importance on its relationship with the local community in which students live and socialise. The University encourages students to engage and participate in community life, and in doing so to develop an ethos of personal and social responsibility. Whilst resident in the local community the University expects students to behave in a way that is respectful and courteous of their neighbours and other members of their community and not to engage in anti-social behaviour that causes distress or harm to others. Where possible and appropriate the University will attempt to resolve complaints locally, working in partnership with police and other statutory authorities if necessary. Persistent cases or cases which cannot be resolved locally may be referred to the Student Cases Office for disciplinary action. The Anti-Social Behaviour Policy can be found: http://www.exeter.ac.uk/businessandcommunity/university/students/issues/ This principle also applies to the students who are resident in University accommodation, where we would expect a similar level of responsibility and reasonable behaviour. Please refer to the Terms and Conditions of Residence. |
3.10 |
The University has a zero tolerance approach to drugs within its accommodation and on its campuses. Students found in possession and/or smoking/taking drugs will be subject to the University disciplinary procedures. The University will co-operate fully in any police investigation into the use, supply or provision of controlled drugs or substance abuse. The University's Student Alcohol and Drugs Policy can be found here. |
4 | General Principles |
4.1 | Normally an allegation will be investigated in the first instance in accordance with section 6, unless the allegations are deemed sufficiently serious as to be considered by the Head of Student Cases (or nominee) as relevant for immediate referral to a major disciplinary board (as described in section 9). |
4.2 |
This procedures seeks to operate in a fair manner; it does not seek to reproduce elements of the criminal law or criminal justice system and is not a formal legal process, although the University has legal obligations which will apply to this procedure: for instance, the duty to act fairly and reasonably in relation to all parties in the application of this procedure. The rules of evidence in English law do not apply; the standard of proof required is the balance of probabilities: that is, it is more likely than not that the alleged misconduct occurred. The procedure complies with the rules of natural justice, which confer on a student right to know the case against them; the right will be given an opportunity to defend themselves; the right to confidentiality and the right for the case to be considered by an impartial arbiter. |
4.3 |
The student may be accompanied, but not represented by, a supporter, who may not act as an advocate. Students involved in disciplinary procedures shall have the right to be accompanied to any investigative meeting or hearing by a fellow student or member of staff from the University, Students' Guild or FXU. The supporter is there to provide moral support. The student is expected to speak on their own behalf, there is no automatic right for a supporter to speak on the student's behalf and it is at the Chair's/Authorised Officer's discretion as to whether the supporter is permitted to address the meeting. Should a supporter act outside those actions described the Chair/Authorised Officer will suspend the meeting and ask the supporter to leave, in the event that the student is unable to continue the meeting without the supporter them meeting will continue in the student's absence based on the documentation provided and any verbal representations received up to that point. |
4.4 | The University will wherever possible seek to adhere to the time limits outlined within these procedures, but in cases where there are special circumstances which require variance from specified time limits, students will be advised of the reasons for this by the Disciplinary Officer handling the investigation or hearing. |
4.5 | Where possible and practical, students will be given the opportunity to attend disciplinary hearings to defend themselves in person. However, the University reserves the right to proceed with any investigative or disciplinary hearing in the absence of a student, subject to the student having been properly notified of the date and time of the hearing (failure not to attend without due notification may lead to further disciplinary action see 7.1 below), or in cases where criminal proceedings do not allow the student to attend in person. The University will ensure that the student is given opportunity to make written representation where they cannot attend in person. |
4.6 | The University reserves the right not to proceed with any investigation following an allegation against the behaviour of a student if it is considered that there is insufficient grounds or evidence to do so. |
4.7 | During the application of these Disciplinary Procedures the University reserves the right to adjourn any disciplinary investigation or hearing and reconvene at a later date. |
4.8 |
When investigating an alleged breach of University regulations, the Authorised Officer will request any relevant information which may include CCTV/body worn camera footage from Estate Patrol. Where the alleged breach has occurred in Guild run premises, the University will work in partnership with the Guild and share data which may include CCTV footage. |
4.9 |
In the case of students registered for online programmes, the University should not require attendance by the student at any meeting or hearing convened under these regulations, but should use its best endeavours to enable the student to participate by telephone or video conference, as an alternative to physical attendance. If it is not possible to arrange within a reasonable timescale, or at a reasonable time in the UK working day, a meeting at which the student may participate by telephone or video conference, the University may proceed to hold the meeting in the student’s absence. In such cases the student will be invited to submit written comments which must be considered by the committee at the appropriate point(s) in proceedings. The proceedings of any such committee or panel will not be invalidated simply by virtue of the student not attending. |
5 | Definition of disciplinary offences |
5.1 | In general terms, disciplinary offences are likely to fall into one of the categories below and maybe heard under the minor or major disciplinary processes depending on the severity of the case:
|
5.1.1 |
Actions which cause actual or potential distress or harm to others irrespective of whether or not distress or harm was intended:
|
5.1.2 |
Actions which cause actual or potential damage to property of others:
|
5.1.3 |
Actions which disrupt the normal operations, and/or safe use of, the University including where applicable, reputational damage to the University:
|
5.1.4 |
Actions which impede or interfere with the pursuance of work/study of University members, or impact on normal operations of the University:
|
5.1.5 | Where students are cited in multiple or repeated offences, cases will be considered with the upmost seriousness. |
5.1.6 | The University will normally only investigate disciplinary offences which occur on University owned or operated premises and facilities. However, the University reserves the right to investigate allegations which occur off its campuses if it is deemed that a student's action may impact the wider University community. Where allegations of misconduct that have occurred off campus, the University will not normally be able to take action unless there is a demonstrable impact on the wider University community. The University cannot act in the place of a private landlord or the police. |
5.2 | In addition violation of Examination Regulations specifically a noise disturbance will be considered as a disciplinary offence. Following an invigilators report as submitted to the Student Cases Office a minimum fine of £50 will be levied against a candidate. There will be no requirement to attend a Minor Disciplinary meeting however, the student will have the right to appeal the decision as set out in Section 12 'Right of Appeal for Minor Offences'. |
6 | Investigative Meeting(s) |
6.1 | Normally an incident(s) that suggests an alleged breach of the University's regulations and/or Terms and Conditions of Residence will be conducted via an investigative meeting in the first instance and in some cases it may be necessary to undertake investigative meetings simply in order to establish the facts of a case. An example of this would be incident(s) involving a number of students where it is necessary to establish who was involved, in what capacity and to what extent in order to identify who could be ruled in or out of an investigation. |
6.2 | Invitations to an investigative meeting will be conveyed to the Student's University of Exeter email account (which should be checked daily), this email will outline the nature of the matter under investigation. Where possible this invitation should be written and should give the student at least 48 hours' notice of the meeting. However, there may be circumstances when an urgent investigation is required and in this case an invitation, verbal and/or in writing, with less than 48 hours' notice may be given. |
6.3 | Where possible and appropriate, action in respect of minor disciplinary offences should be taken locally and close to the source of the alleged offence by staff authorised to act as Disciplinary Officers, as outlined in section 14. |
6.4 |
The investigative meeting is called in order to allow the student to hear the nature of the matter under investigation and to present their response to the investigation. The Authorised Officers will undertake whatever investigation they feel is necessary to establish the facts of the case. |
6.5 | In cases where video/audio footage is to be used in the investigation of an alleged offence, the video/audio footage may be shown to a group where more than one individual is involved in the alleged offence. |
6.6 |
The outcome of an investigative meeting will normally be one of the following:
|
7 | Procedures for Hearings - Minor Offences |
7.1 | Where, during an investigative meeting, the Authorised Officer concludes that the allegation(s) should be treated as a minor offence, the Authorised Officer may convert the investigative meeting to a disciplinary hearing to conclude the matter, subject to the student's consent and subject to the requirements of natural justice. If the student does not consent or the Authorised Officer concludes that it is not in the interests of natural justice, the disciplinary hearing will be convened at a later date. |
7.2 | At all times the Authorised Officer should be mindful of any ongoing risk posed to students and staff relating to the alleged offence. In cases where a risk assessment suggests that there may be an ongoing risk, the Authorised Officer may seek to consult the Head of Student Services (or nominee) in relation to the management risk, and where appropriate may take precautionary action as outlined in section 12. It is unlikely that any offence classified as minor would require temporary suspension and/or exclusion from the University, although it may be necessary to agree a precautionary behavioural contract or limited exclusion from specific facility or service. |
7.3 | The Disciplinary Officer will advise the student in writing of the outcome, within ten working days, and will confirm the imposition of any sanction, including:
|
7.4 | In addition the Authorised Officer may recommend to the Guild the imposition of a ban from specific Guild outlets and/or Guild commercial activities. |
8 | Right of appeal for minor offences |
8.1 | A student may exercise the right to appeal against the outcome of a minor disciplinary hearing by completing the Disciplinary Offences Appeal Form and submitting it to the Disciplinary Officer at studentconductmail@exeter.ac.uk within ten working days of the date of the letter notifying the outcome of the disciplinary hearing. All relevant evidence which is to be considered must be submitted with the appeal application. The University will not gather evidence on a student's behalf. |
8.2 | The request for the right to appeal will be considered by the Director of Compliance, Governance and Risk (or nominee). The student will be asked to select the ground(s) on which their appeal is being invoked, the right to appeal will only be granted if you have presented, on the face of it, evidence of the following:
|
8.3 | If, on the face of it, there are grounds for appeal, the Director of Compliance, Governance and Risk (or nominee) will undertake a review of the papers, but will not re-hear the case or interview the student. He/she may then decide to take action as follows:
|
8.4 | The student will be notified of the decision within ten working days of the receipt of the letter requesting the right to appeal. |
9 | Procedure for Hearings – Major Offences |
9.1 | If an allegation(s) is deemed by the Head of Student Cases (or nominee) to be sufficiently serious, the case will be referred to a (non-standing) Disciplinary Board (Major Offence). |
9.2 | Where the alleged offence has been classified as major, a member of the Student Cases team, acting as the relevant Authorised Officer, may conduct an investigation under 6 above for referral to the Major Disciplinary hearing. |
9.3 | The membership of this Disciplinary Board shall comprise the following;
|
9.4 | In cases which involve alleged reputational damage to the University, the Board will also include an additional member who is independent from the University, whose role will be to ensure the Board adheres to the principle of impartiality in consideration of the alleged offence. |
9.5 | The student will be advised in writing of the nature of the alleged offence and the date of the hearing. This written notification will usually be provided at least ten working days in advance of the meeting to the student's University email account (which should be checked daily). Where the Chair deems there are exceptional circumstances which require a shorter period of notice to be given, the reasons for this will be explained to the student. |
9.6 | The Authorised/Investigative Officer or the student may wish to invite witnesses to appear before the board or to provide written statements. If this is the case the student should advise the Secretary of the Board at least seven working days before the hearing, to allow the Secretary to advise the potential witnesses, collect statements, and circulate to both the Board and the student. |
9.7 | Statements and other documentation, such as a report on the referral of the alleged offence(s) to a Major Disciplinary Board, will be circulated to the Board and the student not less than five working days in advance of the meeting, although later circulation may be allowed at the discretion of the Chair. |
9.8 | If the student does not attend the Disciplinary Board the Chair may decide to proceed in his/her absence. |
9.9 | The procedure of the meeting will be as follows:
|
9.10 | Following the meeting the student will be notified of the outcome in writing within five working days of the meeting, confirming the imposition of any sanction as outlined below, (or those outlined in, section 11.8 where the Board consider the offence should be classified as minor):
|
9.11 | In addition the Authorised Officer may recommend to the Guild the imposition of a ban from specific Guild outlets and/or Guild commercial activities. |
9.12 | The student will be notified of the decision in the form of a summary outcome which will include the penalty imposed and reasons for it within 5 working days of the hearing. This will be followed up with a full report, which will be the full written record of the meeting and an outcome letter. The student will have 10 working days following receipt of the full report and outcome letter to submit an appeal (for further information see section 10). |
10 | Appeals – Major Offences |
10.1 | A student may exercise the right to appeal against the outcome of a major disciplinary hearing, by completing the Disciplinary Offences Appeal Form and submitting it to the Student Cases Office within 10 working days of receipt of the full report and outcome letter. All relevant evidence which is to be considered must be submitted with the appeal application. The University will not gather evidence on a student's behalf. |
10.2 | The University should normally aim to resolve the appeal within 30 calendar days of receipt of the appeal, or otherwise inform you of the expected delay. |
10.3 |
The consideration of an appeal against the outcome of a Major Disciplinary Board will be conducted differently depending on the penalties applied. Section 10.5 explains how an appeal is considered in cases where the decision of the Disciplinary Board (Major offence) is to recommend that Senate grant a permanent exclusion. Section 10.7 explains how an appeal is considered in cases where any other penalty (or range of penalties) has been applied. |
10.4 | The student will be asked to select the ground(s) on which their appeal is being invoked, the request for the right to appeal will only be granted if there is, on the face of it, evidence of the following:
|
10.5 |
In cases where the decision of the Disciplinary Board (Major Offences) is to recommend that Senate grant a permanent exclusion, the student may request an appeal against this decision. This appeal will be considered initially by a Board constituted of three members of Senate who will not previously have been involved in the case. A member of Compliance, Governance and Risk will be appointed as Secretary to the Senate Appeal Board. |
10.6 | The Senate Appeal Board will appoint one if its members to act as Chair. The consideration of the appeal will explore if the student has presented prima facie grounds for appeal (on the grounds described in 10.4) based on the documentation submitted by the student as part of the appeal as well as the full documentation originally submitted as part of the Major Disciplinary Board. If the Senate Appeal Board are agreed (by verdict of 2:1 vote or greater) that the student has presented, on the face of it, grounds for appeal, a Senate Appeal Board will be convened in line with section 10.9 below. |
10.7 | All appeals relating to an outcome of a Major Disciplinary Board that applied a penalty (or range of penalties) other than permanent exclusion from the University will be considered by the Director of Compliance, Governance and Risk (or nominee), or by a senior manager of similar status within Professional Services Leadership Team. The consideration of the appeal will explore if the student has presented, on the face of it, grounds for appeal (on the grounds described in 10.4) based on the documentation submitted by the student as part of the appeal as well as the full documentation originally submitted as part of the Major Disciplinary Board. |
10.8 |
If the Director of Compliance, Governance and Risk (or nominee) considers that there is a case, on the face of it, for appeal, the case will be referred to a Disciplinary Appeal Board (Major Offence), the membership of which shall comprise
A member of Compliance, Governance and Risk will be appointed as Secretary to the Disciplinary Appeal Board (Major Offence) |
10.9 |
Procedures for Senate Appeal Board/Disciplinary Appeal Board (Major Offence) |
10.10 |
The student will be informed of the date of the relevant Appeal Board meeting at least 10 working days in advance. The student may choose to attend the Appeal Board but the Appeal Board may also hear a case in the student's absence. If the student is unable to attend the Appeal Board in person they may attend the meeting via telephone or other electronic means. |
10.11 |
A member of the Major Disciplinary Board will be asked to attend the Appeal Board. |
10.12 |
The student will have the right to be supported at the meeting, normally by a registered student or employee of the University and/or an officer of the Students' Guild Advice Unit/FXU. The supporter is there to provide moral support, to support the student in their preparations for the meeting and to support the student with asking and answering question during the meeting. The student will be expected to speak on their own behalf and it will be at the Chair's discretions to whether the supporter is permitted to address the Appeal Board. Should the supporter act outside those actions described the Chair will suspend the meeting and ask the supporter to leave, in the event the student was unable to continue the meeting without the supporter the meeting will continue in the student's absence based on the documentation provided and any verbal representation received up to that point. The student must inform the secretary of the Appeal Board of the name of anyone the student wishes to accompany them at least 1 working day before the meeting. The person accompanying the student may speak on the student's behalf with the agreement of the Chair. |
10.13 |
Copies of all the documents to be considered will be circulated to the student and the Appeal Board at least 5 working days before the meeting. |
10.14 |
The meeting will begin with private discussions by the Appeal Board to clarify matters of process. |
10.15 | The student and a member of the Disciplinary Board (Major Offences) will be invited to join the meeting. The student will first be invited to present their statement about the case. The Appeal Board will then question the student about their case. The member of the Disciplinary Board (Major Offences) will then be invited to present a statement on behalf of the Disciplinary Board (Major Offences). The Appeal Board will then question the member of the Disciplinary Board (Major Offences) about the case. Once all questions have been asked and answered the member of the Disciplinary Board (Major Offences) will be invited to make closing remarks. The student will then be invited to make closing remarks. The Appeal Board will retire to consider its verdict. |
10.16 | The Senate Appeal Board (Major Offence) shall have the authority to:
|
10.17 | Where an appeal was not deemed to have presented, on the face of it, grounds for appeal the student will receive an outcome letter which explains the decisions and the reasons for it. Where a Senate Appeal/Disciplinary Appeal Board (Major Offence) has been convened the student will receive a summary outcome within 5 working days of the Appeal Board with a full report and outcome letter to follow. In either case the outcome letter will explain that the student's case has exhausted the University's procedures and will explain the student's right to request a review of their case by the Office of the Independent Adjudicator. |
11 | Disciplinary offences which are also subject to criminal investigation |
11.1 |
Where a case is being investigated by the Police, the University will first and foremost cooperate with the criminal investigation. This will not preclude the University from taking precautionary action where there is deemed a health and safety risk to the wider University community. |
11.2 |
Where a complaint is made by a student against a student which result in an investigation by the police, the university reserved the right to inform the complainant of any requirements that the police have place on the University's Disciplinary case. Where a matter is subject to police investigation as well as the University Disciplinary procedure the University reserves the right to communicate with the police as relevant. |
11.3 | Where there is a criminal investigation the Authorised Officer will make regular contact with the student under investigation of the Disciplinary procedure and/or police to review any progress and/or change in status regarding the case. Where there are updates to the progress and/or change in status regarding the case the student must update the Authorised Officer within 24 hours. |
11.4 | Where a charge or conviction has been brought, the Authorised Officer will make recommendations to the Director of Education and Student Experience who will recommend next steps in-line with sections 6, 7, 9 and 12 taking into account the following guidance: |
11.4.1 | Where the student has been charged or convicted of a criminal offence, the University will review if the offence(s) are a breach of the University's Regulations that may be considered under the procedure. In the case that the matter has resulted in a conviction in a criminal court this shall be taken as conclusive evidence that the alleged offence has occurred, and no investigation shall be required by the University. |
11.4.2 | Where a charge or criminal conviction has been made, the focus of University disciplinary proceedings may include an assessment of the risk posed to staff or students. It may also include assessment of the material impact caused by reputational damage to the University, particularly when this impedes or interferes with the normal operations of the University, or when it affects important relationships between the University and key individuals, agencies and stakeholders. If disciplinary action is taken, the penalty imposed by the court shall be taken into account when determining any further penalty. |
11.4.3 | In the case of a charge or criminal conviction, where criminal proceedings (including bail conditions, period of time spent on remand, period of time served in custody following conviction) result in a student being absent from his/her study for a period of less than 12 months it will normally be the case that his/her studies will be interrupted for this period. In such circumstances it will be the responsibility of the student to notify the Student Cases Office regarding the date of release from custody. The Director of Education and Student Experience (or nominee) will then assess the case in accordance with 9.3 above. |
11.4.4 | In the case of a criminal conviction where criminal proceedings (including bail conditions, period of time spent on remand, period of time served in custody following conviction) result in a student being absent from his/her study for a period in excess of 12 months, the student will be deemed withdrawn from the University. The student may then reapply for admission to the University, and as part of the standard admissions process will be required to declare criminal convictions to be considered prior to a decision regarding an offer of a place. For further information on admissions procedures in respect of criminal convictions see http://www.exeter.ac.uk/crb/ |
11.4.5 | Where the student has been acquitted the University will take into account the decision of the court. |
12 | Precautionary action in advance of a disciplinary hearing |
12.1 | Where the nature of the alleged disciplinary offence suggests that there may be risk to the safety of others, or where the student accused of the offence may be at risk of harm, or where he student's presence on campus may impede an investigation, the Head of Student Services (or nominee) will undertake a risk assessment, This may result in action as follows: |
12.1.1 | As a first step he/she may require the student to comply with specific conditions as laid out in a precautionary contract. The precautionary contract should not be regarded as a penalty, and does not indicate that the student is presumed guilty of any offence. The purpose of the precautionary contract is outline the expectations of the student's conduct during a period of investigation, it could include for example agreeing not to contact another student or students. The consequence of any breach of these conditions may result in escalation to any of the steps outlined below. |
12.1.2 | Where a student fails to adhere to the precautionary contract, this may result in referral to a major disciplinary hearing in accordance with section 6.5 above. |
12.1.3 | A request may be made to a Deputy Vice Chancellor to exercise the authority granted under University Statutes to suspend the student from any class or classes and/or to exclude the student from any part or all of the University facilities, grounds and premises, until such a time as any criminal proceedings and/or University disciplinary proceedings have concluded. A precautionary suspension or exclusion should not be regarded as a penalty, and does not indicate that the student is presumed guilty of any offence. |
12.1.4 | The decision to temporarily suspend and/or exclude the student from all or part of the University, and the reasons why this action is being taken may be communicated verbally in the first instance. Where this is the case, written confirmation outlining the reasons for this decision and notice of the right of appeal should be provided within two working days. |
12.2 | The decision to suspend and/or exclude a student will be reviewed by the University at regular intervals so as to ensure that any relevant change in circumstance are considered in a timely manner. Whilst the precautionary suspension and/or exclusion is in place, the student may request a review if there is a relevant change to his/her circumstances. This request should be made in writing to the Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive, who will respond within 10 days of the receipt of the letter. |
12.3 | In cases where precautionary action has been taken this will normally be referred to a Major Disciplinary Board unless the Head of Student Cases (or nominee) determines there are sufficient grounds to classify the case, on investigation, as minor. |
12.4 | The student may appeal against the decision to suspend and/or exclude him or herself from all or part of the University, by submitting a written request stating the reason for the appeal to the office of the Vice Chancellor and Chief Executive (or nominee) within five working days of the date issued on the notice of the exclusion. All relevant evidence which is to be considered must be submitted with the appeal application. The University will not gather evidence on a student's behalf. |
12.5 | The Vice Chancellor and Chief Executive will consider the appeal and may take action as follows:
|
12.6 | The student will be notified of the decision within ten working days of the receipt of the letter requesting an appeal. |
13 | Reporting and Monitoring |
13.1 | Records relating to minor offences shall be held locally by the Disciplinary Officer responsible for instigating the procedure except where professional accrediting bodies require notification to the College concerned. |
13.2 | Authorised Officers holding records of minor offences will submit an annual report outlining numbers, types and outcomes of disciplinary offences to the Student Cases Office. |
13.3 |
A member of the Student Cases team will compile an annual report of all minor and major disciplinary cases for submission to Senate annually. |
14 |
Authorised Disciplinary Officers (Minor Offences) |
14.1 |
Where alleged offences are classified as minor in line with the guidance in section 6, disciplinary proceedings may be instigated locally by relevant staff within the University (Exeter and Cornwall campuses), INTO and Athletics Union (AU) |
14.2 |
Senate has authorised the following staff to investigate and impose penalties for minor disciplinary offences:
|
14.3 | Where alleged misconduct is deemed to be major, a Disciplinary Board (Major Offences) will be convened with membership as outlined in section 9) |