Academic conduct and practice
Academic Misconduct
When concerns are raised about the Academic Integrity of a student's assignment during the marking process, these are considered by trained Academic Conduct Officers within each discipline. The Conduct Officers use their academic judgement tol decide if the work needs to be referred into the Academic Misconduct process. The Academic Misconduct process will be used to determine whether an academic offence has occured within the assignment.
We realise that in some cases a breach in Academic Integrity can occur unintentionally or unknowingly but in order to maintain the University's standards of academic honesty and integrity, and to be fair to all students we do have to carefully consider all concerns raised.
Information about the principles and procedures which will be observed by the University when considering concerns about academic integrity can be found in Chapter 12 of the Teaching Quality Assurance Manual:
Chapter 12 - Academic Conduct and Practice.
The University has developed three levels of severity for academic offences. These are:
- Poor academic practice. This may arise from a lack of understanding of academic protocols or a misunderstanding of expected academic conventions of the department. In these cases there is no evidence that a student has set out to decieve a marker.
- Academic misconduct. This would involve behaviour and practices which, if undetected, would have deceived the marker and could lead the student to obtain an unfair advantage over another student.
- Severe academic misconduct. This would involve extensive evidence of plagiarism or cheating or clear evidence of behaviour which is designed to deceive the marker and/or to gain an advantage by the student who submitted the work.
The University’s definition of academic conduct and the procedures surrounding it are set out in Chapter 12 of the Assessment Progression and Awarding Handbook ‘Academic Conduct and Practice’ and you can read that here.
Definition of Offences
An academic offence is defined as an act or failure to act that if undetected gives, or aims to give, an advantage over other students, or any behaviour which may deceive those setting, administering and marking a piece of work. Academic offences can take a number of forms including but not limited to:
- Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism: Plagiarism is the act of represententing words, ideas, or work obtained from another source, without proper attribution or permission and presenting it as one's own original work. This can include copying and pasting text from a source without citation or attribution; paraphrasing source material without giving credit or by only changing a few words; using a concerpt or ideas obtained from another source without acknowldgement; or submitting another's work as your own. Self-plagiarism is the act of reusing your own previosuly submitted work without citation.
- Collusion: Collusion occurs where two or more students collaborate to produce work that is submitted as the individual work of one or more of the students.
- Coercion: Coercion occurs when a student puts pressure on (or attempts to put pressure on) another student or member of staff to act in a particular way, with the intention of gaining an academic advantage.
- Fabrication: Creation of false data, research or references with the intention of deceiving the marker.
- Falsification: Inappropriate manipulation or selection of data, images or consents with the intention of decieivng the marker.
- Misrepresentation: Misrepresenting data, or the work of someone else as your own, in whole or in part. Note, evidence of an attempt to disguise any of the forms of plagiarism listed above (which might involve the use of paraphrasing systems or translation systems, or a translator or third party who acts as more than a proof-reader under the University’s regulations) will normally be treated more severely than plagiarism alone.
- Contract Cheating: Contract cheating nvolves a student requesting a third-party to complete an assessment, or part of an assessment, on their behalf, which may or may not involve a commercial transaction.
- Use or possession of unauthorised material in an assessment: For example taking notes or electronic devices into an examination or assessment without expression to do so.
- Obtaining or sharing an examination paper ahead of its authorised release or obtaining/sharing another student's answer to an examination paper.
- Impersonation of another individal due to be sitting an assessment.
Academic Conduct Officers
Each Discipline appoints an Academic Conduct Officer and each College appoints a Senior Academic Conduct Officer who provide information and guidance on the academic conduct process and good academic practice, as well as conducting any academic conduct investigation. Please note that for matters relating to in person invigilated exam conduct you will need to contact studentcases@exeter.ac.uk instead of your departmental Conduct Officers.
Please find a list below of Senior Academic Conduct Officers and Academic Conduct Officers below:
Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences |
|
Department |
Senior / Academic Conduct Officer |
Senior Academic Conduct Officers |
Shane Glackin (Law; English and Creative Writing; Communications, Drama and Film; Languages, Cultures and Visual Studies; and Institute of Arabic and Islamic Studies) Victoria Hamlyn (Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy and Anthropology; Archaeology and History; and Classics, Ancient History, and Religion and Theology) |
Communications, Drama and Film |
Haili Li |
English and Creative Writing |
Niall Allsopp |
Languages, Cultures and Visual Studies |
Fernando Concha |
Classics, Ancient History, and Religion and Theology |
Daniel King |
Archaeology and History |
Semih Celik and Sophie Beckett |
Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy and Anthropology |
Jessica Groling and Sandra Kröger |
The Law School |
Chunping Bush, Robert Herian & Malcolm Rogge |
School of Education |
Laura Guihen and Victoria Wong |
Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies |
Ross Porter |
Humanities and Social Science Penryn (Politics and Humanities) |
Alyson Mercer |
Humanities and Social Science Penryn (Law) |
Caroline Keenan |
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences |
|
Department |
Senior / Academic Conduct Officer |
Senior Academic Conduct Officers |
Alex Clarke (Clinical and Biomedical Sciences; Health and Community Sciences; and Health and Care Professions) Matt Campbell (Biosciences; Psychology; CEDAR; and Public Health and Sport Sciences) |
Biosciences |
Tetsu Kudoh |
Psychology |
Andy Higginson |
CEDAR |
Faye Small |
Health and Care Professions |
Hairil Abdul Razak (Medical Imaging) Victoria Sadler (Nursing) |
Health and Community Sciences |
Becca Lovell & Tom Ridler |
Clinical and Biomedical Sciences |
Wondwossen Abate, Erum Erum, Tom Ridler, Vikki Moye, Rebecca Lovell & Sarah Allman |
Public Health and Sport Sciences |
Matthew Black & Kirsty Brock |
Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy |
|
Department |
Senior / Academic Conduct Officer |
Senior Academic Conduct Officers |
Asif Tahir & Mohammad Akrami (Engineering; Physics and Astronomy; Mathematics and Statistics; and Computer Science) Leila Dawney (Geography; Ecology and Conservation; and Earth and Environmental Sciences) Eva Poen, Sarah Bailey, Giancarlo Ianulardo, Idika Uduma, Samuel Odewunmi & Anthony Wood (Business School) |
Engineering |
Halim Alwi & Gianmario Rinaldi |
Physics and Astronomy |
Alex Corbett |
Geography (Streatham) |
Lizzie Hobson |
Mathematics and Statistics |
Vadim Biktashev |
Computer Science |
Zeliang Wang |
Earth and Environmental Sciences Penryn (CGES, CSM and Maths) |
Sarah Crowley (CGES), Clemens Ullman (CSM) & Yasser Maghsoudi Mehrani (Maths) |
Ecology and Conservation (Penryn) |
Erik Postma |
Finance and Accounting |
Cherie Chen, Jinlin Li & Anthony Wood |
Management |
Idika Uduma, Chris Reedthomas, Michael Rowlinson, Fiona Smith, Rom Okeke, Lei Liu & Amir Mehralian |
SITE (Management) |
Ji Han Eunice Oppon and Jenny Tunley Price (Penryn) |
Economics |
Amy Binner, Stephane Hlaimi & Jingya Zeng |
Apprenticeships |
Rumana Huq |
INTO |
|
Department |
Senior / Academic Conduct Officer |
Senior Academic Conduct Officer |
Daniel Moore |
Academic Director |
Karen Glide |
International Year One in Business |
Chris Cross |
International Year One in Psychology & International Year One in Bioscience |
Soo Yim |
International Year One in Engineering & International Year One in Maths |
Robyn Levine |
International Foundation |
Ben Jacobs & James Merrett |
Graduate Diploma |
Luke Adams & Areeya (Amy) Srisai |
Pre-Sessional |
Antonia Paterson |
Academic English |
Rebecca Michel |
In-Sessional & TESOL |
Emma Sweeney |
Examination Misconduct
There are important rules concerning exam conduct that all students, regardless of Faculty or level of study, are expected to follow. These are available online her: Guidance to Candidates.
Students who are caught breaking this guidance will be treated in accordance with the University's Assessment, Progression and Awarding Handbook, Chapter 12 - academic conduct and practice, which lists the following offences specifically relevant to exams:
- The use or possession of unauthorised books, notes, software, electronic devices or other materials in an examination (unless specifically permitted).
- Obtaining an examination paper ahead of its authorised release.
- Attempting to impersonate or impersonation of another individual, due to be sitting a specific assessment.
Specific offences that the University has a zero tolerance approach to are:
- The possession of any form of electronic device, which includes mobile phones, iPods or MP3 players and any form of smart watch on or near your person during an exam whether it be switched on or off and;
- Being in possession of unauthorised material. This may be notes about the topic, or formula written on a hand or arm or other materials found on or near your person.