Debates and Contestations in Art History
Module title | Debates and Contestations in Art History |
---|---|
Module code | AHV2002 |
Academic year | 2024/5 |
Credits | 15 |
Module staff | Dr Fiona Allen (Convenor) |
Duration: Term | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Duration: Weeks | 11 |
Module description
This module explores the possibility of adopting an object-centred approach to Art History & Visual Culture. Spanning across a range of historical and geopolitical contexts, each week offers a close reading of an artwork, cultural artefact or everyday object. Rather than attempting to provide an overview of key moments in the discipline or create an alternative canon, the module will introduce you to a range of critical frameworks for engaging with object and the broader issues – or debates – they provoke, from the role of cultural heritage to questions of censorship. It will also invite you to consider how these ways of reading can be used in your written assignments.
Module aims - intentions of the module
This module will introduce you to the benefits of adopting an object-centred approach to Art History & Visual Culture. Through a series of lectures, workshops and practical sessions, you will examine a series of cultural artefacts and their accompanying literature. As part of this process, both object and scholarship will be subject to critical analysis, resulting in a well-informed, independent position on the object in question. You will also consider the extent to which the meaning of works of art and visual culture is open to revision.
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
ILO: Module-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 1. Describe and analyse selected works of art in detail
- 2. Situate works of art in appropriate historical and/or critical contexts
- 3. Work with a variety of methodologies and theoretical approaches for the interpretation of works of art
- 4. Critically discriminate between different art historical approaches in terms of their explanatory power
ILO: Discipline-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 5. Research, present and evaluate relevant historical and critical material with increased independence
- 6. Interrogate and evaluate works of art and their attendant literature and relate them to the wider context of cultural and intellectual history
ILO: Personal and key skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 7. Through writing and project assessments, demonstrate good research and bibliographic skills, an informed capacity to construct a coherent, substantiated argument, and a capacity to write clear and correct prose
- 8. Through research for projects and essays, demonstrate good proficiency in information retrieval and analysis
- 9. Through project work, demonstrate the ability to work collaboratively orally and/or in written form, and in teams towards the development, research, organisation, and expression of ideas under pressure of time
Syllabus plan
The objects discussed on the module will vary from year to year. Possible case studies might include:
- The Ajanta caves
- Kanga
- 4’33”
- The Swing
- Portrait Miniatures
- The Statue of Liberty
- Older, Deeper, Wider, Higher Power
- The AIDS Memorial Quilt
Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
---|---|---|
22 | 128 | 0 |
Details of learning activities and teaching methods
Category | Hours of study time | Description |
---|---|---|
Scheduled learning and teaching | 11 | 11 x 1 hour lectures |
Scheduled learning and teaching | 10 | 5 x 2 hour seminars - these will be led by the tutor. You will need to prepare for each seminar and to present on a given topic on at least one occasion |
Scheduled learning and teaching | 1 | Tutorial guidance for reading, research and essay preparation |
Guided independent study | 128 | Independent study including reading, research, preparation for seminars and assessments |
Formative assessment
Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|
Mini-Essay | 750 words | 1-8 | Feedback sheet with opportunity for tutorial follow-up |
Oral presentation | 5-10 minutes | 1-9 | Peer-assessment recorded on feedback sheet with tutorial follow-up |
Summative assessment (% of credit)
Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
---|---|---|
100 | 0 | 0 |
Details of summative assessment
Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|---|
Essay | 100 | 2,500 words | 1-8 | Feedback sheet with opportunity for tutorial follow-up |
Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)
Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
---|---|---|---|
Essay | Essay | 1-8 | Referral/deferral period |
Re-assessment notes
Deferral – if you miss an assessment for certificated reasons judged acceptable by the Mitigation Committee, you will normally be either deferred in the assessment or an extension may be granted. The mark given for a re-assessment taken as a result of deferral will not be capped and will be treated as it would be if it were your first attempt at the assessment.
Referral – if you have failed the module overall (i.e. a final overall module mark of less than 40%) you will be required to submit a further assessment as necessary. If you are successful on referral, your overall module mark will be capped at 40%.
Indicative learning resources - Basic reading
- Adams, L.S., The Methodologies of Art: An Introduction, 2010
- Baxandall, M., Patterns of Intention: On the Historical Explanation of Pictures, 1985
- Davis, W., “Vision has an Art History,” in A General Theory of Visual Culture, 2011, 3-10
- During, S. Cultural Studies: A Critical Introduction, 2005.
- Fernie, E. Art History and its methods, 1995
- Frascina, F. and Harris, J.,eds, Art in Modern Culture: An Anthology of Critical Texts, 1992
- Fried, M. Art and Objecthood, 1998
- Grau. O. ed. Imagery in the 21st Century, 2011
- Hooper-Greenhill, E., Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture, 2000
- Iversen, M. and Melville, S., “What’s the Matter with Methodology?” in Writing Art History: Disciplinary Departures, 2010, 1-14
- Krauss, R., The Optical Unconscious, 1993
- Manghani, S. "Understanding Images," in Image Studies: Theory and Practice, 2012, 25-49.
- Mitchell, W. J. T., "What Do Pictures Want?" in What Do Pictures Want: The Lives and Loves of Images, 2005, 28-56.
- Nelson, R. and Schiff, R., eds, Critical Terms for Art History, 2003
- Nelson, R., ed. Visuality Before and Beyond the Renaissance; Seeing as Others Saw, 2000
- Pinder, K.N. ed., Race-ing Art History: Critical Readings in Race and Art History, 2002
- Preziosi, D., ed. The Art of Art History: A Critical Anthology, 2009
- Rampley, M., "Visual Culture and the Meanings of Culture," in Exploring Visual Culture: Definitions, Concepts, Contexts, 2005, 5-17.
- Rasheed, A., S. Cubitt, and Z. Sardar, eds. The Third Text Reader on Art, culture and Theory, 2007
- Smith, P. and C. Wilde. A Companion to Art Theory, 2016
- Steinberg, L., “The Philosophical Brothel,” October 44 (Spring 1988), 7-74
Indicative learning resources - Web based and electronic resources
Credit value | 15 |
---|---|
Module ECTS | 7.5 |
Module pre-requisites | None |
Module co-requisites | None |
NQF level (module) | 5 |
Available as distance learning? | No |
Origin date | 01/10/2011 |
Last revision date | 11/12/2023 |