Research Methodology and Grant Proposal
Module title | Research Methodology and Grant Proposal |
---|---|
Module code | BIOM710Z |
Academic year | 2024/5 |
Credits | 15 |
Module staff | Professor Mark Ramsdale (Convenor) |
Duration: Term | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Duration: Weeks | 8 |
Number students taking module (anticipated) | 40 |
---|
Module description
This module introduces you to the processes required for undertaking an independent, but supervised, research project at postgraduate level. Specifically, this module prepares you for your MSc Medical Mycology project by supporting your own research into the background literature, allowing you to formulate a hypotheses relating to your research project. You will then develop a research proposal, through which you will plan your BIOM711Z research project, identifying achievable aims and objectives, considering aspects such as experimental design, data handling and time management. In the module, the current landscape for funding of Medical Mycology research projects and how to write a competitive research grant proposal will also be examined. The practicalities of managing a research project, including time management and the collection and storing of small and large datasets, will also be covered.
As part of this module you will further develop the following academic and professional skills:
- Ability to navigate the medical mycology (and related) research landscape
- Identifying research priorities and define a research question
- Undertake and interpret systematic reviews
- Designing and managing a research project
- Write a research proposal
Possible topics for the MSc Research Project include scientific research in any of the subjects being taught on the MSc, from studies of molecular and cellular events to patient outcomes, provided that the project involves original data collection / collation.
The election of the MSc Research Project topic and supervisor(s) should be the result of an agreement between the student, the local British Society for Medical Mycology (BSMM) supervisor and the designated course tutor. The criteria for the MSc Research Project evaluation will be clearly stated in the MSc handbook, and they will include at least the following items:
- The originality of the research
- The degree of difficulty of the original work carried out
- The robustness of the methodological approach
- The quality of the written dissertation
- The quality of the oral presentation
- The arguments used in its defence.
Students should have completed four modules from a selection of BIOM703Z-BIOM709Z prior to taking this module.
Module aims - intentions of the module
This module will introduce the theory and skills required for the successful completion of research in biomedical or medical science with particular reference to Medical Mycology. Requirements for funding, ethical design of a project, identifying the appropriate statistical tools and software resources for data management, selection of appropriate experimental design, will be specifically addressed.
The project is the final module of the MSc programme but many students will wish to start organising and initiating their project earlier on in the course. Following discussion with the course tutor and local supervisor, topic titles and a short outline of the research activity will need to be submitted for approval to the Committee before the work commences. The project should be original work conducted in the student’s base laboratory or within the clinical environment but involving supervision by their course tutor and a local supervisor.
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
ILO: Module-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 1. Critically and independently assess the field in which your research project will be conducted
- 2. Independently define a clear research hypothesis that can be tested within the research project
- 3. Identify appropriate research methodologies, experimental design, data analysis, and time management plans
ILO: Discipline-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 4. Analyse and critically evaluate essential facts and theory across a sub-discipline of the biosciences (specifically medical mycology), and embed research-informed examples from the literature in written work
- 5. Evaluate, in detail, approaches to our understanding of the biosciences with reference to primary literature, reviews and research articles
- 6. Identify appropriate methodologies and theories for solving a range of problems in the biosciences
ILO: Personal and key skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 7. Devise and sustain, with little guidance, a logical and reasoned argument with convincing conclusions
- 8. Communicate effectively arguments, evidence and conclusions using a variety of formats in a manner appropriate to the intended audience
- 9. Analyse and evaluate appropriate data and complete a range of research-like tasks with very limited guidance
- 10. Evaluate strengths and weaknesses in relation to graduate-level professional and practical skills, and act autonomously to develop new areas of skill as necessary
Syllabus plan
Preliminary sessions will focus on current funding agencies supporting medical mycology and related topics in the biomedical sciences, this will include a consideration of the types of funding available, and how to write a competitive research grant proposal. In addition, the module will also focus on the challenges associated with managing a research project, including time management and the collection and storing of data. The development of the research proposal will then be conducted in conjunction with the local research supervisor, and the nominated course tutor who will provide individual guidance through regular discussion meetings.
Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)
Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
---|---|---|
16 | 134 |
Details of learning activities and teaching methods
Category | Hours of study time | Description |
---|---|---|
Scheduled Learning and Teaching | 4 | General introductory guidance on development of a project proposal |
Scheduled Learning and Teaching | 12 | Development of the project proposal in conjunction with a research supervisor, who will provide individual guidance through discussion meetings |
Guided independent study | 134 | Independent study, including directed reading, literature research, investigating potential experimental designs and proposal writing |
Formative assessment
Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|
Short answer questions during meetings with the project supervisor | Ongoing throughout the module | All | Oral |
Summative assessment (% of credit)
Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
---|---|---|
100 | 0 | 0 |
Details of summative assessment
Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
---|---|---|---|---|
Paper from collated data | 40 | 1500 words | All | Written |
Project proposal | 60 | 2500 words | All | Written |
0 | ||||
0 | ||||
0 | ||||
0 |
Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)
Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
---|---|---|---|
Paper from collated data | Paper from collated data (40%) | All | 8 weeks from the date feedback was given |
Project proposal | Project proposal (60%) | All | 8 weeks from the date feedback was given |
Re-assessment notes
Deferral – if you miss an assessment for certificated reasons that are approved by the Mitigation Committee, you will normally be either deferred in the assessment or an extension may be granted. If deferred, the format and timing of the re-assessment for each of the summative assessments is detailed in the table above ('Details of re-assessment'). The mark given for a deferred assessment will not be capped and will be treated as it would be if it were your first attempt at the assessment.
Referral - if you have failed the module (i.e. a final overall module mark of less than 50%) and the module cannot be condoned, you will be required to complete a re-assessment for each of the failed components on the module. The format and timing of the re-assessment for each of the summative assessments is detailed in the table above ('Details of re-assessment'). If you pass the module following re-assessment, your module mark will be capped at 50%.
Indicative learning resources - Basic reading
As agreed between you and your project supervisors. Reference will be made to the most recent articles and reports in the field and will focus on the primary literature.
Also of use when planning and writing the proposal will be:
- Ruxton, G.D. and Colegrave, N. (2006) Experimental Design for the Life Sciences. OUP. ISBN 01992 52327
- Barass, R (2002) Scientists Must Write: A Guide to Better Writing for Scientists, Engineers and Students
Indicative learning resources - Other resources
- Relevant papers will be included within each section of the module
Credit value | 15 |
---|---|
Module ECTS | 7.5 |
Module pre-requisites | Four modules from BIOM704 – BIOM709 |
Module co-requisites | BIOM711Z |
NQF level (module) | 7 |
Available as distance learning? | Yes |
Origin date | 14/03/2022 |
Last revision date | 01/11/2023 |