Moral agency in social context
| Module title | Moral agency in social context |
|---|---|
| Module code | PHL2118 |
| Academic year | 2024/5 |
| Credits | 15 |
| Module staff | Dr Nigel Pleasants (Convenor) |
| Duration: Term | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration: Weeks | 11 |
| Number students taking module (anticipated) | 150 |
|---|
Module description
The core theme of this module is the extent to which, and ways in which, moral perception, judgement and action may be socially conditioned and constrained. It consists in examination of the social conditions of morality, moral belief, moral agency, and moral responsibility, addressing such questions as: Is moral consciousness and agency determined by individuals’ social conditions of existence, or are individuals’ moral beliefs and agency internal powers that actively contribute to social reproduction and change? It will look at philosophical analyses of the nature and conditions of morality, and of the relation between individual moral agency and social context. It will examine these ideas in relation to the major social and economic institutions of modern society, such as, the maintenance and abolition of slavery, the justice and necessity of economic inequalities, obligations to aid people suffering life-threatening poverty, and the relationship between moral or political belief and action in conformity with such belief.
Module aims - intentions of the module
The aim of this module is to encourage and enable you to reflect critically on ways in which people’s social conditions, including students’ own social conditions, might shape and constrain their moral knowledge and agency. The module draws on materials from the social sciences, such as the history of slavery and abolition, the sociology of inequality, and connects with analytical philosophical debates on collective moral responsibility, the social conditions of knowledge and ignorance, and the nature and extent of moral duties to needy others. In essence, you will learn to think about the ways in which society impacts on our individual capacity for moral agency.
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
ILO: Module-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 1. address philosophically the question of whether or how far people's moral beliefs and agency are determined or constrained by their social conditions of existence;
- 2. Demonstrate the ability to think about moral questions in a specifically social and institutional context.
ILO: Discipline-specific skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 3. think, reason and argue analytically in social philosophy;
- 4. apply philosophical analysis to practical issues of historical and contemporary significance.
ILO: Personal and key skills
On successfully completing the module you will be able to...
- 5. deploy philosophical analysis in the assessment of everyday personal and social practices; and
- 6. demonstrate the ability to reflect on taken for granted assumptions.
Syllabus plan
Whilst the module’s precise content may vary from year to year, it is envisaged that the syllabus will cover some or all of the following topics:
Collective responsibility
The Marxian view of morality.
Social context and moral ignorance.
Social change and moral agency: the case of slavery, abolition and emancipation. Inequality, functional importance and incentives.
Personal/political agency & collective responsibility
Rich egalitarianism?
Duties to alleviate absolute poverty?
Moral saintliness & the demandingness of morality.
Learning activities and teaching methods (given in hours of study time)
| Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities | Guided independent study | Placement / study abroad |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | 128 |
Details of learning activities and teaching methods
| Category | Hours of study time | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled learning and teaching activities | 22 | 1 hour weekly lecture + 1 hour weekly seminar |
| Guided independent study | 45 | Preparation for tutorial participation including reading and planning |
| Guided independent study | 83 | Preparation for essay, library, research etc. |
Formative assessment
| Form of assessment | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essay plan | 500 word max | 1-6 | Written or verbal |
Summative assessment (% of credit)
| Coursework | Written exams | Practical exams |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | 40 | 0 |
Details of summative assessment
| Form of assessment | % of credit | Size of the assessment (eg length / duration) | ILOs assessed | Feedback method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essay | 60 | 1,800 words | 1-6 | Written |
| Exam | 40 | 1 hour | 1-6 | Written |
| 0 | ||||
| 0 | ||||
| 0 | ||||
| 0 | ||||
| 0 |
Details of re-assessment (where required by referral or deferral)
| Original form of assessment | Form of re-assessment | ILOs re-assessed | Timescale for re-assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essay | Essay 1 (1,800 words) | 1-6 | August/September re-assessment period |
| Exam | 1 hour exam | 1-6 | August/September reassessment period |
Indicative learning resources - Basic reading
T. Bender (ed.) (1992) The antislavery debate: capitalism and abolitionism as a problem in historical interpretation
G. Cohen (2000) If You’re an egalitarian, how come you’re so rich?
M. Moody-Adams (1997) Fieldwork in familiar places: morality, culture, and philosophy.
N. Pleasants (2008) ‘Institutional wrongdoing and moral perception’ Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (1), 96–115.
N. Pleasants ‘Moral argument is not enough: The persistence of slavery and the emergence of abolition’, Philosophical Topics, vol 38 (1), 2010, 139-60
| Credit value | 15 |
|---|---|
| Module ECTS | 7.5 |
| Module pre-requisites | None |
| Module co-requisites | None |
| NQF level (module) | 5 |
| Available as distance learning? | No |
| Origin date | 22/02/2021 |
| Last revision date | 21/12/2021 |
